Organisation

Armament Technology Incorporated

CA-E-0BCQ-5C27ACTIVECanada (federal)Nova ScotiaQuébecHALIFAX3 independent sources

$24.7MPublic money on record

30Employees reported

3Independent publishers

79/100Evidence depth

October 24, 2026Latest source capture

On the record

Identifier: CA-E-0BCQ-5C27
Status detail: LEI LAPSED · GLEIF PARTIALLY_CORROBORATED
Address: 60A Otter Lake Court, Halifax, NS, B3S 1L9
Earliest record: November 30, 2004

Identifiers held

Business number: 859769648
Legal Entity Identifier: 254900AYK9NJNWKSPB05
yul-supplier: 107155

Global legal identity. This organisation carries a Legal Entity Identifier in the GLEIF system. The LEI is evidence attached to this entities.ca record; it does not replace the permanent Canadian Entity Identifier. Open the GLEIF source record.

Québec keeps a fuller record than this one. The Registre des entreprises publishes each registered business’s directors, officers and ultimate beneficiaries — the ownership question no federal source answers in bulk. It is not reproduced here: it is published under a licence forbidding commercial use and requiring derivatives to carry the same terms, which this project will not impose on the open data it is joined to. Search it directly: Registre des entreprises du Québec. Why it is not used here.

Evidence depth

79/100

Deep record

This scores the depth of the public evidence assembled here. It does not score the organisation’s quality, reputation, solvency or risk. The formula is fixed and reproducible. See the formula.

Identityregistrations and identifiers

Operationsmunicipal licences

Filed figuresfinancials or workforce

Public moneycontracts or grants

Relationshipsfiled board or organisation links

Qualificationsstanding offers or supply arrangements

Public activitypermits and recorded work

Regulatorydecided findings

Dated historyevents with effective dates

Public footprint · version 1

Where this organisation appears in public records

Eight independent dimensions describe the size and shape of the evidence. They are deliberately not added into one company score: a licence, a grant, a director filing and a court finding mean different things.

Footprint is not performance.

A larger bar means more public records of that kind. It does not mean better, worse, safer, larger, more profitable or more reputable.

Identityregistries, identifiers and corroboration

Operationslicences and operating places

Filed disclosurepublic financials and workforce

Public moneycontracts, grants and contribution records

Public activitypermits and recorded work

Relationshipsfiled board and identifier-linked organisations

Regulatorydecided public findings

Historydated span and recorded events

Each dimension uses fixed, logarithmic caps so one dataset with thousands of repeated rows cannot drown out every other fact. Read the formula and limits.

Registrations

Registrar	Instrument	Number	Registered	Status
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)	Legal Entity Identifier	254900AYK9NJNWKSPB05	November 19, 2020	ACTIVE — LEI LAPSED · GLEIF PARTIALLY_CORROBORATED

Public money on record

Federal contracts

$24,616,751

across 44 awards, 2004–2019

2004$932K

2005$6.6M

2006$595K

2007$160K

2008$659K

2009$1.2M

2010$3.8M

2011$2.1M

2012$1.3M

2013$6.3M

2014$691K

2016$0

2019$198K

Paying institution	Awards	Value
National Defence	44	$24,616,751

Federal grants and contributions

$60,082

across 2 agreements, 2009–2023

2009$45K

2023$15K

Paying institution	Awards	Value
National Research Council Canada	1	$45,082
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada	1	$15,000

Value as published, not money paid. The federal contract value field includes the ceiling of standing offers and supply arrangements — purchasing capacity a department may never draw on. A large figure here can mean a large ceiling rather than a large payment.

Awards are attached to this record only where the evidence identifies exactly one organisation: a name and postal area that narrow to a single company, or a name unique across the whole national corpus. Proactive publication truncates the vendor postal code to three characters, so anything that could belong to more than one company is left unattached rather than guessed at. Totals are a floor in that direction. The full rules.

Qualified to supply the government (1)

Commodity	Buying department	Agreement type	Awarded	Expires
—	—	Société par actions/Corporations/Compagnie	—	—

This is a different fact from public money above: a standing offer or supply arrangement means the government has pre-agreed to buy specific goods or services from this organisation at set terms if it chooses to — it does not mean any money has changed hands. The source publishes only currently active agreements and carries no dollar figure at all, unlike the contract value field, which sometimes states a ceiling rather than a payment. How this is attached.

Timeline

November 10, 2023Federal grant — Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada$15,000
November 19, 2020Registered — Legal Entity Identifier
November 21, 2019Federal contract — National Defence$22,656
October 24, 2019Federal contract — National Defence$175,082
May 27, 2016Federal contract — National Defence
July 29, 2014Federal contract — National Defence$196,529
May 15, 2014Federal contract — National Defence$472,042
February 27, 2014Federal contract — National Defence$22,559
October 7, 2013Federal contract — National Defence$413,892
September 9, 2013Federal contract — National Defence$507,295
August 7, 2013Federal contract — National Defence$4,872,326
April 26, 2013Federal contract — National Defence$498,679
December 20, 2012Federal contract — National Defence$192,500
December 6, 2012Federal contract — National Defence$339,031
October 22, 2012Federal contract — National Defence
September 7, 2012Federal contract — National Defence$455,414
June 29, 2012Federal contract — National Defence$319,354
May 29, 2012Federal contract — National Defence
March 7, 2012Federal contract — National Defence$19,668
August 26, 2011Federal contract — National Defence$16,611
July 8, 2011Federal contract — National Defence$56,228
March 23, 2011Federal contract — National Defence$1,985,879
November 5, 2010Federal contract — National Defence$1,496,210
July 27, 2010Federal contract — National Defence$226,000
May 4, 2010Federal contract — National Defence$142,094
March 25, 2010Federal contract — National Defence$202,020
January 8, 2010Federal contract — National Defence$1,486,296
January 6, 2010Federal contract — National Defence$293,750
June 15, 2009Federal contract — National Defence$877,388
June 10, 2009Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$45,082
February 6, 2009Federal contract — National Defence$347,658
December 10, 2008Federal contract — National Defence$159,920
June 11, 2008Federal contract — National Defence$22,995
May 29, 2008Federal contract — National Defence$298,757
May 2, 2008Federal contract — National Defence$24,806
February 19, 2008Federal contract — National Defence$152,668
September 28, 2007Federal contract — National Defence$134,979
April 4, 2007Federal contract — National Defence$25,154
October 25, 2006Federal contract — National Defence$594,542
September 15, 2005Federal contract — National Defence$4,263,790

Showing the 40 most recent of 46 dated events.

Where this record comes from

Dataset	Last captured	Cadence	Coverage kept	Health
Proactive publication — federal contracts over $10,000 Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada	September 1, 2026	P3M	1 captures · 0 comparisons	current
Proactive disclosure — federal grants and contributions Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada	September 3, 2026	P3M	1 captures · 0 comparisons	current
Global LEI Index — Canadian legal entities Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) · Public Domain — CC0 1.0 Universal	October 24, 2026	P1D	5 captures · 4 comparisons	due
Montréal suppliers Ville de Montréal · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0	September 5, 2026	P1Y	1 captures · 0 comparisons	current

Freshness is measured, not implied. “Last captured” is when this project last completed a read of the whole source dataset. “Coverage kept” is how many immutable captures and meaningful capture-to-capture comparisons are available. A missed day remains an explicit gap; a later snapshot cannot tell us what happened inside it. See every source.

This page is assembled from open data. It is not an official record, and the registrar is authoritative where the two disagree. How records are assembled.

Represent Armament Technology Incorporated? Add a website or contact detail.

More organisations · More in Canada (federal) · Search every record · Compare this organisation · Open the JSON record