entities.ca
Registered charity

Cedar Park united church

CA-E-89G9-REF4CurrentCanada (federal)QuébecPointe-Claire3 independent sources
$412KRevenue reported
$162KPublic money on record
14On the board
7Organisations connected
1Municipal licences
3Independent publishers
89/100Evidence depth
October 25, 2026Latest source capture
On the record
Identifier
CA-E-89G9-REF4
Address
204 LAKEVIEW AVE., POINTE CLAIRE, QC, H9S 4C5
Earliest record
December 6, 2001
Identifiers held
Charity registration
106883366RR0001
Business number
106883366
yul-food
1884
Québec keeps a fuller record than this one. The Registre des entreprises publishes each registered business’s directors, officers and ultimate beneficiaries — the ownership question no federal source answers in bulk. It is not reproduced here: it is published under a licence forbidding commercial use and requiring derivatives to carry the same terms, which this project will not impose on the open data it is joined to. Search it directly: Registre des entreprises du Québec. Why it is not used here.
Evidence depth
89/100
Deep record

This scores the depth of the public evidence assembled here. It does not score the organisation’s quality, reputation, solvency or risk. The formula is fixed and reproducible. See the formula.

Identityregistrations and identifiers
Operationsmunicipal licences
Filed figuresfinancials or workforce
Public moneycontracts or grants
Relationshipsfiled board or organisation links
Qualificationsstanding offers or supply arrangements
Public activitypermits and recorded work
Regulatorydecided findings
Dated historyevents with effective dates

Additional graph evidence outside the score: 7 organisation connections.

Public footprint · version 1

Where this organisation appears in public records

Eight independent dimensions describe the size and shape of the evidence. They are deliberately not added into one company score: a licence, a grant, a director filing and a court finding mean different things.

Footprint is not performance.

A larger bar means more public records of that kind. It does not mean better, worse, safer, larger, more profitable or more reputable.

Identityregistries, identifiers and corroboration
90
Operationslicences and operating places
38
Filed disclosurepublic financials and workforce
60
Public moneycontracts, grants and contribution records
45
Public activitypermits and recorded work
0
Relationshipsfiled board and identifier-linked organisations
73
Regulatorydecided public findings
0
Historydated span and recorded events
75

Each dimension uses fixed, logarithmic caps so one dataset with thousands of repeated rows cannot drown out every other fact. Read the formula and limits.

Registrations
RegistrarInstrumentNumberRegisteredStatus
Canada Revenue AgencyRegistered charity106883366RR0001—Registered
Municipal licences (1)
PlaceCategoryNumberFirst issuedStatus
Pointe-ClaireRestaurant mets pour emporter1884—Open

A licence records permission to operate. It is issued by a municipality, not by a corporate registrar, and its presence says the organisation traded at that address on that date — nothing about whether it does today.

Board and officers on record (14)
NamePositionServing sinceStatus
Elsa DondanazCHAIR—current
Richmund Ninson Abeka-afariTREASURER—current
Margrét KristjanssonSECRETARY—current
William BlevinsBOARD MEMBER—current
Elisabeth JonesMINISTER—current
Jamie StevensBOARD MEMBER—current
Renate SutherlandBOARD MEMBER—current
Norman JonesBOARD MEMBER—current
Heidi SimmonsBOARD MEMBER—current
Jeane BlevinsTRUSTEE—current
Cameron FortinTRUSTEE—current
William HarveyTRUSTEE—current
Terry TaylorTRUSTEE—current
Stephen CheasleyTRUSTEE—current

Filed by the charity itself with the Canada Revenue Agency, under the Open Government Licence. This is the narrowest slate the source publishes — name, position, and tenure only; no address, phone, or email exists in the file to withhold. Why this is published and directors’ home addresses never are.

Organisations sharing a filed director name (7)

Every one of these rests on a single name in common, which is the weakest form this evidence takes — read them as leads, not findings.

OrganisationKindNames in common
L'Association de la Bibliothèque de North Hartley
CA-E-Z5PV-MCWC
Registered charity1
La passerelle - centre d'entraide professionnelle et spirituelle
CA-E-NVWC-YF0C
Registered charity1
Niteo Africa Society
CA-E-AWTQ-HBQH
Registered charity1
Projet Jeunesse de l'Ouest de l'Ile-West Island Youth Project
CA-E-WTHF-DD6R
Registered charity1
Qualicum - Parksville Kiwanis Housing Society
CA-E-PJGN-CA90
Registered charity1
Résonance Montréal INC.
CA-E-XB94-8535
Registered charity1
Seagrave United Church
CA-E-TRYC-C5J0
Registered charity1
One name in common is a lead. Two is a link. These come from the director names each organisation filed with the Canada Revenue Agency, matched exactly as filed, and two people can share a name — across the whole corpus 95% of these rest on a single name, so a single match is genuinely weak evidence and is presented as such rather than dressed up. Two of the same names on the same pair of boards is a different matter: coincidence stops being a plausible explanation. A name appearing on more than eight boards is discarded outright as a probable collision.

The link is between organisations and carries only a count. Which people sit on which board stays on each organisation’s own page, exactly as the CRA published it, and there is deliberately no way here to search by a person or to list what one individual is involved in. Why that line is drawn there.
What it raised and spent — year ended December 31, 2024
Total revenue
$412,187
Total spending
$410,760
Total assets
$485,383
Total liabilities
$83,144
Receipted donations
$204,084
From other charities
$63,190
Granted onward
$21,865
Charitable programs90.3% · $371K · line 5000
Management and administration9.7% · $40K · line 5010
These are the charity’s own figures. They come from the T3010 return it filed with the Canada Revenue Agency, which is a statement the organisation makes about itself rather than an audit or an assessment of it. They are also a single year: a charity that received a capital gift, sold a building, or ran a campaign will look unlike itself.

A low share spent on programs is not by itself evidence of anything. Fundraising costs money, a year of building a reserve looks like underspending, and grant-making foundations pass money onward rather than running programs. The lines are shown as filed, with the CRA line numbers, so a reader can check them against the return.
Public money on record
Federal grants and contributions
$161,886

across 9 agreements, 2015–2025

2015$35K
2016$19K
2020$20K
2021$28K
2022$24K
2024$30K
2025$5K
Value as published, not money paid. The federal contract value field includes the ceiling of standing offers and supply arrangements — purchasing capacity a department may never draw on. A large figure here can mean a large ceiling rather than a large payment.

Awards are attached to this record only where the evidence identifies exactly one organisation: a name and postal area that narrow to a single company, or a name unique across the whole national corpus. Proactive publication truncates the vendor postal code to three characters, so anything that could belong to more than one company is left unattached rather than guessed at. Totals are a floor in that direction. The full rules.
Timeline
  1. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$5,213
  2. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$5,101
  3. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$25,000
  4. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$23,985
  5. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$3,167
  6. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$25,000
  7. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$20,169
  8. Federal grant — Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions$19,251
  9. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$35,000
Why this is one record

5 public datasets from 3 independent publishers describe this organisation. They were joined into one record because the evidence below agreed — never on a matching name alone.

  • Same name and address — 204 lakeview, pointe claire, QC
    asserted by Canada Revenue Agency and Ville de Montréal

An automatic merge requires a shared business number, or a matching name AND address — never a name by itself. How resolution works.

Where this record comes from
DatasetLast capturedCadenceCoverage keptHealth
Registered charities — directors and officers (2024 returns)
Canada Revenue Agency · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 2, 2026P1Y1 captures · 0 comparisonscurrent
Registered charities — financial data (2024 returns)
Canada Revenue Agency · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 5, 2026P1Y1 captures · 0 comparisonscurrent
Registered charities — identification (2024 returns)
Canada Revenue Agency · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 8, 2026P1Y2 captures · 1 comparisonscurrent
Proactive disclosure — federal grants and contributions
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 3, 2026P3M1 captures · 0 comparisonscurrent
Montréal food establishments
Ville de Montréal · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
October 25, 2026P1D9 captures · 8 comparisonscurrent
Freshness is measured, not implied. “Last captured” is when this project last completed a read of the whole source dataset. “Coverage kept” is how many immutable captures and meaningful capture-to-capture comparisons are available. A missed day remains an explicit gap; a later snapshot cannot tell us what happened inside it. See every source.

This page is assembled from open data. It is not an official record, and the registrar is authoritative where the two disagree. How records are assembled.

Represent Cedar Park united church? Add a website or contact detail.

More registered charitys · More in Canada (federal) · Search every record · Compare this organisation · Open the JSON record