Licensed business

Restaurant Tay Do

CA-E-AD4K-75QDClosed — operator changedQuébecMontréal2 independent sources

4Municipal licences

2Independent publishers

73/100Evidence depth

October 25, 2026Latest source capture

On the record

Identifier: CA-E-AD4K-75QD
Status detail: Fermé changement d'exploitant
Address: 300 Avenue Duluth Est, Montréal, QC
Earliest record: November 17, 2008

Identifiers held

yul-food: 102955
yul-food: 117034
yul-food: 15229
yul-food: 2824
yul-poursuite: 5945
yul-poursuite: 6146
yul-poursuite: 6332

Québec keeps a fuller record than this one. The Registre des entreprises publishes each registered business’s directors, officers and ultimate beneficiaries — the ownership question no federal source answers in bulk. It is not reproduced here: it is published under a licence forbidding commercial use and requiring derivatives to carry the same terms, which this project will not impose on the open data it is joined to. Search it directly: Registre des entreprises du Québec. Why it is not used here.

Evidence depth

73/100

Layered record

This scores the depth of the public evidence assembled here. It does not score the organisation’s quality, reputation, solvency or risk. The formula is fixed and reproducible. See the formula.

Identityregistrations and identifiers

Operationsmunicipal licences

Filed figuresfinancials or workforce

Public moneycontracts or grants

Relationshipsfiled board or organisation links

Qualificationsstanding offers or supply arrangements

Public activitypermits and recorded work

Regulatorydecided findings

Dated historyevents with effective dates

Additional graph evidence outside the score: 2 same-address neighbours.

Public footprint · version 1

Where this organisation appears in public records

Eight independent dimensions describe the size and shape of the evidence. They are deliberately not added into one company score: a licence, a grant, a director filing and a court finding mean different things.

Footprint is not performance.

A larger bar means more public records of that kind. It does not mean better, worse, safer, larger, more profitable or more reputable.

Identityregistries, identifiers and corroboration

Operationslicences and operating places

Filed disclosurepublic financials and workforce

Public moneycontracts, grants and contribution records

Public activitypermits and recorded work

Relationshipsfiled board and identifier-linked organisations

Regulatorydecided public findings

Historydated span and recorded events

Each dimension uses fixed, logarithmic caps so one dataset with thousands of repeated rows cannot drown out every other fact. Read the formula and limits.

Municipal licences (4)

Place	Category	Number	First issued	Status
Montréal	Restaurant	2824	—	Closed — operator changed
Montréal	Restaurant	15229	—	Closed — operator changed
Montréal	Restaurant	102955	—	Closed — operator changed
Montréal	Restaurant	117034	—	Closed — operator changed

A licence records permission to operate. It is issued by a municipality, not by a corporate registrar, and its presence says the organisation traded at that address on that date — nothing about whether it does today.

At the same address (2)

Organisations that filed the same street address and suite as this one, 300 AVE DULUTH E.

Organisation	Kind
Restaurant Don Juan CA-E-AM92-NC42	Licensed business
Restaurant Tay Do 2013 CA-E-DZ1B-5F9P	Licensed business

A shared door is not always a shared purpose. Sharing an address can mean one organisation with several registered arms, a building a sector clusters in, or simply a landlord. It is a fact about where filings were sent, not a claim about who controls whom.

Addresses used here are only ones already published on these pages: where a single publisher asserts an address it is coarsened to a locality, because a registered office is very often somebody’s home. And where 25 or more organisations share one door — a registered agent or a law firm — no connection is drawn at all, because at that point the address describes the agent rather than the organisations. How address precision is decided.

What it raised and spent

These are the charity’s own figures. They come from the T3010 return it filed with the Canada Revenue Agency, which is a statement the organisation makes about itself rather than an audit or an assessment of it. They are also a single year: a charity that received a capital gift, sold a building, or ran a campaign will look unlike itself.

A low share spent on programs is not by itself evidence of anything. Fundraising costs money, a year of building a reserve looks like underspending, and grant-making foundations pass money onward rather than running programs. The lines are shown as filed, with the CRA line numbers, so a reader can check them against the return.

Findings by a regulator (3)

Decided	Matter	Regulator	Penalty
November 23, 2020	Food safety by-law	Ville de Montréal (Inspection des aliments)	$1,200
January 3, 2019	Food safety by-law	Ville de Montréal (Inspection des aliments)	$250
September 19, 2018	Food safety by-law	Ville de Montréal (Inspection des aliments)	$250

3 findings totalling $1,700.

These are concluded matters, not allegations. Each row is a case a court decided on the date shown, published by the regulator that brought it. Nothing here is a complaint, an inspection score, an unresolved charge, or anything written by a member of the public — a charge that has not been decided is not a finding, and this site does not carry one.

Findings are attached by the regulator’s own identifier for the business, not by matching a name against a name. That is deliberate and it is the reason this section can exist at all: a conviction placed on the wrong company by a fuzzy name match would be a serious thing to have published. A finding can also never be the reason a record exists here — the sources that make these findings are not permitted to create entities, so every page showing one was established by a registrar or a licensor first.

A finding is about a moment. A restaurant fined in 2016 may have changed hands twice since, and the operator today may have no connection to the one prosecuted. Read the date, and follow the link to the publisher for what was actually decided.

Why this is one record

2 public datasets from 2 independent publishers describe this organisation. They were joined into one record because the evidence below agreed — never on a matching name alone.

Same name and address — 300 duluth est, montreal, QC
asserted by Ville de Montréal

An automatic merge requires a shared business number, or a matching name AND address — never a name by itself. How resolution works.

Where this record comes from

Dataset	Last captured	Cadence	Coverage kept	Health
Montréal food establishments Ville de Montréal · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0	October 25, 2026	P1D	9 captures · 8 comparisons	current
Montréal food-safety prosecutions Ville de Montréal (Inspection des aliments) · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0	October 15, 2026	P1M	2 captures · 1 comparisons	current

Freshness is measured, not implied. “Last captured” is when this project last completed a read of the whole source dataset. “Coverage kept” is how many immutable captures and meaningful capture-to-capture comparisons are available. A missed day remains an explicit gap; a later snapshot cannot tell us what happened inside it. See every source.

This page is assembled from open data. It is not an official record, and the registrar is authoritative where the two disagree. How records are assembled.

Represent Restaurant Tay Do? Add a website or contact detail.

More licensed businesss · More in Québec · Search every record · Compare this organisation · Open the JSON record