Licensed business
La Maison Des Delices
CA-E-FWEG-1AVDClosedCanada (federal)QuébecMontréal3 independent sources
$9KPublic money on record
1Municipal licences
3Independent publishers
76/100Evidence depth
October 25, 2026Latest source capture
On the record
- Identifier
- CA-E-FWEG-1AVD
- Status detail
- Fermé
- Address
- 78 Rue De La Gauchetière Ouest, Montréal, QC
- Earliest record
- February 8, 2018
Identifiers held
- Business number
- 791509896
- yul-food
- 107574
- yul-poursuite
- 3565
Québec keeps a fuller record than this one. The Registre des entreprises publishes each registered business’s directors, officers and ultimate beneficiaries — the ownership question no federal source answers in bulk. It is not reproduced here: it is published under a licence forbidding commercial use and requiring derivatives to carry the same terms, which this project will not impose on the open data it is joined to. Search it directly: Registre des entreprises du Québec. Why it is not used here.
Evidence depth
76/100
Deep recordThis scores the depth of the public evidence assembled here. It does not score the organisation’s quality, reputation, solvency or risk. The formula is fixed and reproducible. See the formula.
Identityregistrations and identifiers
Operationsmunicipal licences
Filed figuresfinancials or workforce
Public moneycontracts or grants
Relationshipsfiled board or organisation links
Qualificationsstanding offers or supply arrangements
Public activitypermits and recorded work
Regulatorydecided findings
Dated historyevents with effective dates
Additional graph evidence outside the score: 1 same-address neighbours.
Public footprint · version 1
Where this organisation appears in public records
Eight independent dimensions describe the size and shape of the evidence. They are deliberately not added into one company score: a licence, a grant, a director filing and a court finding mean different things.
Footprint is not performance.
A larger bar means more public records of that kind. It does not mean better, worse, safer, larger, more profitable or more reputable.
Identityregistries, identifiers and corroboration
75
Operationslicences and operating places
38
Filed disclosurepublic financials and workforce
60
Public moneycontracts, grants and contribution records
27
Public activitypermits and recorded work
0
Relationshipsfiled board and identifier-linked organisations
0
Regulatorydecided public findings
37
Historydated span and recorded events
34
Each dimension uses fixed, logarithmic caps so one dataset with thousands of repeated rows cannot drown out every other fact. Read the formula and limits.
Municipal licences (1)
| Place | Category | Number | First issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montréal | Pâtisserie/Boulangerie | 107574 | — | Closed |
A licence records permission to operate. It is issued by a municipality, not by a corporate registrar, and its presence says the organisation traded at that address on that date — nothing about whether it does today.
At the same address (1)
Organisations that filed the same street address and suite as this one, 78 RUE DE LA GAUCHETIÈRE O.
| Organisation | Kind |
|---|---|
| Restaurant Callia CA-E-92JE-W1C7 | Licensed business |
A shared door is not always a shared purpose. Sharing an address can mean one organisation with several registered arms, a building a sector clusters in, or simply a landlord. It is a fact about where filings were sent, not a claim about who controls whom.
Addresses used here are only ones already published on these pages: where a single publisher asserts an address it is coarsened to a locality, because a registered office is very often somebody’s home. And where 25 or more organisations share one door — a registered agent or a law firm — no connection is drawn at all, because at that point the address describes the agent rather than the organisations. How address precision is decided.
Addresses used here are only ones already published on these pages: where a single publisher asserts an address it is coarsened to a locality, because a registered office is very often somebody’s home. And where 25 or more organisations share one door — a registered agent or a law firm — no connection is drawn at all, because at that point the address describes the agent rather than the organisations. How address precision is decided.
What it raised and spent
These are the charity’s own figures. They come from the T3010 return it filed with the Canada Revenue Agency, which is a statement the organisation makes about itself rather than an audit or an assessment of it. They are also a single year: a charity that received a capital gift, sold a building, or ran a campaign will look unlike itself.
A low share spent on programs is not by itself evidence of anything. Fundraising costs money, a year of building a reserve looks like underspending, and grant-making foundations pass money onward rather than running programs. The lines are shown as filed, with the CRA line numbers, so a reader can check them against the return.
A low share spent on programs is not by itself evidence of anything. Fundraising costs money, a year of building a reserve looks like underspending, and grant-making foundations pass money onward rather than running programs. The lines are shown as filed, with the CRA line numbers, so a reader can check them against the return.
Public money on record
Federal grants and contributions
$8,510
across 1 agreement, 2021–2021
| Paying institution | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Employment and Social Development Canada | 1 | $8,510 |
Value as published, not money paid. The federal contract value field includes the ceiling of standing offers and supply arrangements — purchasing capacity a department may never draw on. A large figure here can mean a large ceiling rather than a large payment.
Awards are attached to this record only where the evidence identifies exactly one organisation: a name and postal area that narrow to a single company, or a name unique across the whole national corpus. Proactive publication truncates the vendor postal code to three characters, so anything that could belong to more than one company is left unattached rather than guessed at. Totals are a floor in that direction. The full rules.
Awards are attached to this record only where the evidence identifies exactly one organisation: a name and postal area that narrow to a single company, or a name unique across the whole national corpus. Proactive publication truncates the vendor postal code to three characters, so anything that could belong to more than one company is left unattached rather than guessed at. Totals are a floor in that direction. The full rules.
Findings by a regulator (1)
| Decided | Matter | Regulator | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| February 8, 2018 | Food safety by-law | Ville de Montréal (Inspection des aliments) | $1,200 |
These are concluded matters, not allegations. Each row is a case a court decided on the date shown, published by the regulator that brought it. Nothing here is a complaint, an inspection score, an unresolved charge, or anything written by a member of the public — a charge that has not been decided is not a finding, and this site does not carry one.
Findings are attached by the regulator’s own identifier for the business, not by matching a name against a name. That is deliberate and it is the reason this section can exist at all: a conviction placed on the wrong company by a fuzzy name match would be a serious thing to have published. A finding can also never be the reason a record exists here — the sources that make these findings are not permitted to create entities, so every page showing one was established by a registrar or a licensor first.
A finding is about a moment. A restaurant fined in 2016 may have changed hands twice since, and the operator today may have no connection to the one prosecuted. Read the date, and follow the link to the publisher for what was actually decided.
Findings are attached by the regulator’s own identifier for the business, not by matching a name against a name. That is deliberate and it is the reason this section can exist at all: a conviction placed on the wrong company by a fuzzy name match would be a serious thing to have published. A finding can also never be the reason a record exists here — the sources that make these findings are not permitted to create entities, so every page showing one was established by a registrar or a licensor first.
A finding is about a moment. A restaurant fined in 2016 may have changed hands twice since, and the operator today may have no connection to the one prosecuted. Read the date, and follow the link to the publisher for what was actually decided.
Timeline
- Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$8,510
Where this record comes from
| Dataset | Last captured | Cadence | Coverage kept | Health |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proactive disclosure — federal grants and contributions Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada | September 3, 2026 | P3M | 1 captures · 0 comparisons | current |
| Montréal food establishments Ville de Montréal · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 | October 25, 2026 | P1D | 9 captures · 8 comparisons | current |
| Montréal food-safety prosecutions Ville de Montréal (Inspection des aliments) · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 | October 15, 2026 | P1M | 2 captures · 1 comparisons | current |
Freshness is measured, not implied. “Last captured” is when this project last completed a read of the whole source dataset. “Coverage kept” is how many immutable captures and meaningful capture-to-capture comparisons are available. A missed day remains an explicit gap; a later snapshot cannot tell us what happened inside it. See every source.
This page is assembled from open data. It is not an official record, and the registrar is authoritative where the two disagree. How records are assembled.
Represent La Maison Des Delices? Add a website or contact detail.
More licensed businesss · More in Canada (federal) · Search every record · Compare this organisation · Open the JSON record