Organisation

Technologies Humanware INC.

Legal name on the register: TECHNOLOGIES HUMANWARE INC.

CA-E-H615-VQ48ACTIVECanada (federal)QuébecDrummondville3 independent sources

$5.8MPublic money on record

2Identifier-linked relationships

99Employees reported

3Independent publishers

88/100Evidence depth

October 24, 2026Latest source capture

On the record

Identifier: CA-E-H615-VQ48
Status detail: LEI LAPSED · GLEIF FULLY_CORROBORATED
Address: 1800 rue Jean-Berchmans-Michaud, Drummondville, QC, J2C 7G7
Earliest record: February 6, 2006
Also known as: Investissements Pulse Data Inc.

Identifiers held

Business number: 123464612
Legal Entity Identifier: 549300XZL5FXZNJIKL66
neq: 1175113803
yul-supplier: 703750

Global legal identity. This organisation carries a Legal Entity Identifier in the GLEIF system. The LEI is evidence attached to this entities.ca record; it does not replace the permanent Canadian Entity Identifier. Open the GLEIF source record.

Québec keeps a fuller record than this one. The Registre des entreprises publishes each registered business’s directors, officers and ultimate beneficiaries — the ownership question no federal source answers in bulk. It is not reproduced here: it is published under a licence forbidding commercial use and requiring derivatives to carry the same terms, which this project will not impose on the open data it is joined to. Search it directly: Registre des entreprises du Québec. Why it is not used here.

Evidence depth

88/100

Deep record

This scores the depth of the public evidence assembled here. It does not score the organisation’s quality, reputation, solvency or risk. The formula is fixed and reproducible. See the formula.

Identityregistrations and identifiers

Operationsmunicipal licences

Filed figuresfinancials or workforce

Public moneycontracts or grants

Relationshipsfiled board or organisation links

Qualificationsstanding offers or supply arrangements

Public activitypermits and recorded work

Regulatorydecided findings

Dated historyevents with effective dates

Public footprint · version 1

Where this organisation appears in public records

Eight independent dimensions describe the size and shape of the evidence. They are deliberately not added into one company score: a licence, a grant, a director filing and a court finding mean different things.

Footprint is not performance.

A larger bar means more public records of that kind. It does not mean better, worse, safer, larger, more profitable or more reputable.

Identityregistries, identifiers and corroboration

Operationslicences and operating places

Filed disclosurepublic financials and workforce

Public moneycontracts, grants and contribution records

Public activitypermits and recorded work

Relationshipsfiled board and identifier-linked organisations

Regulatorydecided public findings

Historydated span and recorded events

Each dimension uses fixed, logarithmic caps so one dataset with thousands of repeated rows cannot drown out every other fact. Read the formula and limits.

Registrations

Registrar	Instrument	Number	Registered	Status
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)	Legal Entity Identifier	549300XZL5FXZNJIKL66	September 12, 2014	ACTIVE — LEI LAPSED · GLEIF FULLY_CORROBORATED

Identifier-linked organisation relationships (2)

Relationship	Related legal entity	Status	Last updated
Direct accounting parent	Open LEI record 549300B206THJHUTBP43	active relationship entity supplied only	September 5, 2023
Ultimate accounting parent	Open LEI record 549300M3VH1A3ER1TB49	active relationship entity supplied only	September 5, 2023

Published by GLEIF and joined only through exact Legal Entity Identifiers. A direct or ultimate parent here means an accounting-consolidating parent under GLEIF’s Level 2 model; it does not by itself prove legal or beneficial ownership. Fund-management, subfund and branch relationships keep their own publisher labels rather than being recast as ownership.

Public money on record

Federal contracts

$170,209

across 11 awards, 2006–2025

2006$67K

2007$37K

2008$17K

2011$25K

2016$13K

2025$11K

Paying institution	Awards	Value
Canada Revenue Agency	10	$158,800
Employment and Social Development Canada	1	$11,409

Federal grants and contributions

$5,678,551

across 13 agreements, 2010–2026

2010$27K

2011$1.4M

2012$350K

2013$538K

2019$2.1M

2021$238K

2023$864K

2026$200K

Paying institution	Awards	Value
National Research Council Canada	8	$3,057,334
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada	3	$1,733,717
Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions	2	$887,500

Value as published, not money paid. The federal contract value field includes the ceiling of standing offers and supply arrangements — purchasing capacity a department may never draw on. A large figure here can mean a large ceiling rather than a large payment.

Awards are attached to this record only where the evidence identifies exactly one organisation: a name and postal area that narrow to a single company, or a name unique across the whole national corpus. Proactive publication truncates the vendor postal code to three characters, so anything that could belong to more than one company is left unattached rather than guessed at. Totals are a floor in that direction. The full rules.

Qualified to supply the government (1)

Commodity	Buying department	Agreement type	Awarded	Expires
—	—	Société par actions/Corporations/Compagnie	—	—

This is a different fact from public money above: a standing offer or supply arrangement means the government has pre-agreed to buy specific goods or services from this organisation at set terms if it chooses to — it does not mean any money has changed hands. The source publishes only currently active agreements and carries no dollar figure at all, unlike the contract value field, which sometimes states a ceiling rather than a payment. How this is attached.

What it does

Industry code: 334110 · 541710 · 541990
North American Industry Classification System

Trade and licence class are the publisher’s own words, kept as written rather than mapped onto a vocabulary of this site’s invention — a Calgary “RESTAURANT” and a Montréal “Restaurant service rapide” describe the same thing and are not the same string, and pretending otherwise would put words in a city’s mouth. The industry code is the exception: NAICS is a standard shared across Canada, the United States and Mexico, so it means the same thing wherever it appears. Only some publishers assign one.

Timeline

May 19, 2026Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$200,000
February 5, 2025Federal contract — Employment and Social Development Canada$11,409
May 1, 2023Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$393,214
April 1, 2023Federal grant — Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada$470,567
August 23, 2021Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$37,600
July 29, 2021Federal grant — Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada$200,000
March 4, 2019Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$1,000,000
February 1, 2019Federal grant — Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada$1,063,150
February 13, 2018Direct accounting-parent relationship began — LEI 549300B206THJHUTBP43
February 13, 2018Ultimate accounting-parent relationship began — LEI 549300M3VH1A3ER1TB49
January 6, 2016Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$12,558
September 12, 2014Registered — Legal Entity Identifier
October 11, 2013Federal grant — Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions$537,500
March 19, 2012Federal grant — Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions$350,000
May 2, 2011Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$250,000
May 2, 2011Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$475,000
May 2, 2011Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$675,000
January 28, 2011Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$24,538
May 14, 2010Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$26,520
January 14, 2008Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$17,238
December 27, 2007Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$11,332
March 14, 2007Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$11,453
January 16, 2007Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$14,576
December 7, 2006Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$19,398
March 6, 2006Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$13,348
March 6, 2006Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$20,300
February 6, 2006Federal contract — Canada Revenue Agency$14,060

Where this record comes from

Dataset	Last captured	Cadence	Coverage kept	Health
Proactive publication — federal contracts over $10,000 Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada	September 1, 2026	P3M	1 captures · 0 comparisons	current
Proactive disclosure — federal grants and contributions Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada	September 3, 2026	P3M	1 captures · 0 comparisons	current
Global LEI Index — Canadian legal entities Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) · Public Domain — CC0 1.0 Universal	October 24, 2026	P1D	5 captures · 4 comparisons	due
Global LEI Index — relationship records Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) · Public Domain — CC0 1.0 Universal	October 24, 2026	P1D	5 captures · 4 comparisons	due
Montréal suppliers Ville de Montréal · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0	September 5, 2026	P1Y	1 captures · 0 comparisons	current

Freshness is measured, not implied. “Last captured” is when this project last completed a read of the whole source dataset. “Coverage kept” is how many immutable captures and meaningful capture-to-capture comparisons are available. A missed day remains an explicit gap; a later snapshot cannot tell us what happened inside it. See every source.

This page is assembled from open data. It is not an official record, and the registrar is authoritative where the two disagree. How records are assembled.

Represent Technologies Humanware INC.? Add a website or contact detail.

More organisations · More in Canada (federal) · Search every record · Compare this organisation · Open the JSON record