Registered charity
Société De Verdissement Du Montreal Metropolitain
Legal name on the register: SOCIÉTÉ DE VERDISSEMENT DU MONTREAL METROPOLITAIN
CA-E-SPMH-DSN1CurrentCanada (federal)QuébecMONTREAL3 independent sources
$7.2MRevenue reported
$20.1MPublic money on record
10On the board
4Organisations connected
20Employees reported
3Independent publishers
88/100Evidence depth
September 8, 2026Latest source capture
On the record
- Identifier
- CA-E-SPMH-DSN1
- Address
- 701 - 5333 AV CASGRAIN, MONTREAL, QC, H2T 1X3
- Earliest record
- March 1, 2011
- Also known as
- Soverdi · SOVERDI
Identifiers held
- Charity registration
- 136472735RR0001
- Business number
- 103811303
- Business number
- 136472735
- neq
- 1147036603
- yul-supplier
- 36848
Québec keeps a fuller record than this one. The Registre des entreprises publishes each registered business’s directors, officers and ultimate beneficiaries — the ownership question no federal source answers in bulk. It is not reproduced here: it is published under a licence forbidding commercial use and requiring derivatives to carry the same terms, which this project will not impose on the open data it is joined to. Search it directly: Registre des entreprises du Québec. Why it is not used here.
Evidence depth
88/100
Deep recordThis scores the depth of the public evidence assembled here. It does not score the organisation’s quality, reputation, solvency or risk. The formula is fixed and reproducible. See the formula.
Identityregistrations and identifiers
Operationsmunicipal licences
Filed figuresfinancials or workforce
Public moneycontracts or grants
Relationshipsfiled board or organisation links
Qualificationsstanding offers or supply arrangements
Public activitypermits and recorded work
Regulatorydecided findings
Dated historyevents with effective dates
Additional graph evidence outside the score: 4 organisation connections · 1 same-address neighbours.
Public footprint · version 1
Where this organisation appears in public records
Eight independent dimensions describe the size and shape of the evidence. They are deliberately not added into one company score: a licence, a grant, a director filing and a court finding mean different things.
Footprint is not performance.
A larger bar means more public records of that kind. It does not mean better, worse, safer, larger, more profitable or more reputable.
Identityregistries, identifiers and corroboration
85
Operationslicences and operating places
0
Filed disclosurepublic financials and workforce
100
Public moneycontracts, grants and contribution records
61
Public activitypermits and recorded work
0
Relationshipsfiled board and identifier-linked organisations
67
Regulatorydecided public findings
0
Historydated span and recorded events
75
Each dimension uses fixed, logarithmic caps so one dataset with thousands of repeated rows cannot drown out every other fact. Read the formula and limits.
Registrations
| Registrar | Instrument | Number | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada Revenue Agency | Registered charity | 136472735RR0001 | — | Registered |
Board and officers on record (10)
| Name | Position | Serving since | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre-alexandre Taché | ADMINISTRATEUR | March 25, 2025 | current |
| Suzanne Lareau | ADMINISTRATEUR | December 10, 2024 | current |
| Fatoumata A Dite Woy Touré | ADMINISTRATEUR | November 25, 2024 | current |
| Ismael Chevalier | ADMINISTRATEUR | September 24, 2024 | current |
| Marie Rougier | ADMINISTRATEUR | September 24, 2024 | current |
| Marie-claire Dumas | PRÉSIDENTE | June 18, 2024 | current |
| Janice Noronha | AMDINISTRATRICE | July 17, 2018 | current |
| Delphine Pittet | SECRÉTAIRE | March 3, 2017 | current |
| Bob Lussier | ADMINISTRATEUR | June 1, 2011 | current |
| Marie-chantal Dréau | TRÉSORIÈRE | March 1, 2011 | current |
Filed by the charity itself with the Canada Revenue Agency, under the Open Government Licence. This is the narrowest slate the source publishes — name, position, and tenure only; no address, phone, or email exists in the file to withhold. Why this is published and directors’ home addresses never are.
Organisations sharing a filed director name (4)
Every one of these rests on a single name in common, which is the weakest form this evidence takes — read them as leads, not findings.
| Organisation | Kind | Names in common |
|---|---|---|
| Centre D'etude Et De Cooperation Internationale CA-E-8XJ8-HPGY | Registered charity | 1 |
| Fondation Philantra CA-E-DDNA-JEXX | Registered charity | 1 |
| Institut De Recherches Cliniques De Montreal CA-E-APF4-Z26Y | Registered charity | 1 |
| Y Des Femmes De Montréal/women's Y Of Montréal CA-E-FYDG-WPM6 | Registered charity | 1 |
One name in common is a lead. Two is a link. These come from the director names each organisation filed with the Canada Revenue Agency, matched exactly as filed, and two people can share a name — across the whole corpus 95% of these rest on a single name, so a single match is genuinely weak evidence and is presented as such rather than dressed up. Two of the same names on the same pair of boards is a different matter: coincidence stops being a plausible explanation. A name appearing on more than eight boards is discarded outright as a probable collision.
The link is between organisations and carries only a count. Which people sit on which board stays on each organisation’s own page, exactly as the CRA published it, and there is deliberately no way here to search by a person or to list what one individual is involved in. Why that line is drawn there.
The link is between organisations and carries only a count. Which people sit on which board stays on each organisation’s own page, exactly as the CRA published it, and there is deliberately no way here to search by a person or to list what one individual is involved in. Why that line is drawn there.
At the same address (1)
Organisations that filed the same street address and suite as this one, 5333 AVE CASGRAIN #701.
| Organisation | Kind |
|---|---|
| Societe De Developpement Communautaire De Montreal (sodecm) CA-E-24TB-CA5D | Registered charity |
A shared door is not always a shared purpose. Sharing an address can mean one organisation with several registered arms, a building a sector clusters in, or simply a landlord. It is a fact about where filings were sent, not a claim about who controls whom.
Addresses used here are only ones already published on these pages: where a single publisher asserts an address it is coarsened to a locality, because a registered office is very often somebody’s home. And where 25 or more organisations share one door — a registered agent or a law firm — no connection is drawn at all, because at that point the address describes the agent rather than the organisations. How address precision is decided.
Addresses used here are only ones already published on these pages: where a single publisher asserts an address it is coarsened to a locality, because a registered office is very often somebody’s home. And where 25 or more organisations share one door — a registered agent or a law firm — no connection is drawn at all, because at that point the address describes the agent rather than the organisations. How address precision is decided.
What it raised and spent — year ended December 31, 2024
- Total revenue
- $7,151,954
- Total spending
- $6,938,382
- Total assets
- $3,435,023
- Total liabilities
- $1,896,440
- Receipted donations
- $1,001,103
Charitable programs86.7% · $6.0M · line 5000
Management and administration13.3% · $923K · line 5010
These are the charity’s own figures. They come from the T3010 return it filed with the Canada Revenue Agency, which is a statement the organisation makes about itself rather than an audit or an assessment of it. They are also a single year: a charity that received a capital gift, sold a building, or ran a campaign will look unlike itself.
A low share spent on programs is not by itself evidence of anything. Fundraising costs money, a year of building a reserve looks like underspending, and grant-making foundations pass money onward rather than running programs. The lines are shown as filed, with the CRA line numbers, so a reader can check them against the return.
A low share spent on programs is not by itself evidence of anything. Fundraising costs money, a year of building a reserve looks like underspending, and grant-making foundations pass money onward rather than running programs. The lines are shown as filed, with the CRA line numbers, so a reader can check them against the return.
Public money on record
Federal grants and contributions
$20,053,704
across 9 agreements, 2018–2025
| Paying institution | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Natural Resources Canada | 1 | $19,999,990 |
| Employment and Social Development Canada | 8 | $53,714 |
Value as published, not money paid. The federal contract value field includes the ceiling of standing offers and supply arrangements — purchasing capacity a department may never draw on. A large figure here can mean a large ceiling rather than a large payment.
Awards are attached to this record only where the evidence identifies exactly one organisation: a name and postal area that narrow to a single company, or a name unique across the whole national corpus. Proactive publication truncates the vendor postal code to three characters, so anything that could belong to more than one company is left unattached rather than guessed at. Totals are a floor in that direction. The full rules.
Awards are attached to this record only where the evidence identifies exactly one organisation: a name and postal area that narrow to a single company, or a name unique across the whole national corpus. Proactive publication truncates the vendor postal code to three characters, so anything that could belong to more than one company is left unattached rather than guessed at. Totals are a floor in that direction. The full rules.
Qualified to supply the government (1)
| Commodity | Buying department | Agreement type | Awarded | Expires |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | Organisme à but non lucratif | — | — |
This is a different fact from public money above: a standing offer or supply arrangement means the government has pre-agreed to buy specific goods or services from this organisation at set terms if it chooses to — it does not mean any money has changed hands. The source publishes only currently active agreements and carries no dollar figure at all, unlike the contract value field, which sometimes states a ceiling rather than a payment. How this is attached.
Timeline
- Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$5,213
- Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$5,101
- Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$4,936
- Federal grant — Natural Resources Canada$19,999,990
- Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$9,196
- Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$13,037
- Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$7,700
- Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$4,211
- Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$4,320
Where this record comes from
| Dataset | Last captured | Cadence | Coverage kept | Health |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registered charities — directors and officers (2024 returns) Canada Revenue Agency · Open Government Licence – Canada | September 2, 2026 | P1Y | 1 captures · 0 comparisons | current |
| Registered charities — financial data (2024 returns) Canada Revenue Agency · Open Government Licence – Canada | September 5, 2026 | P1Y | 1 captures · 0 comparisons | current |
| Registered charities — identification (2024 returns) Canada Revenue Agency · Open Government Licence – Canada | September 8, 2026 | P1Y | 2 captures · 1 comparisons | current |
| Proactive disclosure — federal grants and contributions Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada | September 3, 2026 | P3M | 1 captures · 0 comparisons | current |
| Montréal suppliers Ville de Montréal · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 | September 5, 2026 | P1Y | 1 captures · 0 comparisons | current |
Freshness is measured, not implied. “Last captured” is when this project last completed a read of the whole source dataset. “Coverage kept” is how many immutable captures and meaningful capture-to-capture comparisons are available. A missed day remains an explicit gap; a later snapshot cannot tell us what happened inside it. See every source.
This page is assembled from open data. It is not an official record, and the registrar is authoritative where the two disagree. How records are assembled.
Represent Société De Verdissement Du Montreal Metropolitain? Add a website or contact detail.
More registered charitys · More in Canada (federal) · Search every record · Compare this organisation · Open the JSON record