entities.ca
Licensed business

Cegep Andre-laurendeau

CA-E-HDB5-FSD7ClosedCanada (federal)QuébecLaSalleLASALLE2 independent sources
$2.1MPublic money on record
1Municipal licences
400Employees reported
2Independent publishers
74/100Evidence depth
October 25, 2026Latest source capture
On the record
Identifier
CA-E-HDB5-FSD7
Status detail
Fermé
Address
1111 Rue Lapierre, LaSalle, QC
Earliest record
September 23, 2015
Identifiers held
neq
8814178933
yul-food
104594
yul-supplier
114908
Québec keeps a fuller record than this one. The Registre des entreprises publishes each registered business’s directors, officers and ultimate beneficiaries — the ownership question no federal source answers in bulk. It is not reproduced here: it is published under a licence forbidding commercial use and requiring derivatives to carry the same terms, which this project will not impose on the open data it is joined to. Search it directly: Registre des entreprises du Québec. Why it is not used here.
Evidence depth
74/100
Layered record

This scores the depth of the public evidence assembled here. It does not score the organisation’s quality, reputation, solvency or risk. The formula is fixed and reproducible. See the formula.

Identityregistrations and identifiers
Operationsmunicipal licences
Filed figuresfinancials or workforce
Public moneycontracts or grants
Relationshipsfiled board or organisation links
Qualificationsstanding offers or supply arrangements
Public activitypermits and recorded work
Regulatorydecided findings
Dated historyevents with effective dates

Additional graph evidence outside the score: 2 same-address neighbours.

Public footprint · version 1

Where this organisation appears in public records

Eight independent dimensions describe the size and shape of the evidence. They are deliberately not added into one company score: a licence, a grant, a director filing and a court finding mean different things.

Footprint is not performance.

A larger bar means more public records of that kind. It does not mean better, worse, safer, larger, more profitable or more reputable.

Identityregistries, identifiers and corroboration
60
Operationslicences and operating places
48
Filed disclosurepublic financials and workforce
40
Public moneycontracts, grants and contribution records
60
Public activitypermits and recorded work
0
Relationshipsfiled board and identifier-linked organisations
0
Regulatorydecided public findings
0
Historydated span and recorded events
82

Each dimension uses fixed, logarithmic caps so one dataset with thousands of repeated rows cannot drown out every other fact. Read the formula and limits.

Municipal licences (1)
PlaceCategoryNumberFirst issuedStatus
LaSalleCafétéria institution d'enseignement104594—Closed

A licence records permission to operate. It is issued by a municipality, not by a corporate registrar, and its presence says the organisation traded at that address on that date — nothing about whether it does today.

At the same address (2)

Organisations that filed the same street address and suite as this one, 1111 RUE LAPIERRE.

OrganisationKind
Sensilaser Technologies INC.
CA-E-Y1YK-BETG
Federal corporation
Société De La Salle Jean-grimaldi
CA-E-TB28-04MC
Registered charity
A shared door is not always a shared purpose. Sharing an address can mean one organisation with several registered arms, a building a sector clusters in, or simply a landlord. It is a fact about where filings were sent, not a claim about who controls whom.

Addresses used here are only ones already published on these pages: where a single publisher asserts an address it is coarsened to a locality, because a registered office is very often somebody’s home. And where 25 or more organisations share one door — a registered agent or a law firm — no connection is drawn at all, because at that point the address describes the agent rather than the organisations. How address precision is decided.
Public money on record
Federal grants and contributions
$2,148,703

across 32 agreements, 2018–2025

2018$100K
2019$88K
2020$810K
2021$1.1M
2022$49K
2024$6K
2025$6K
Value as published, not money paid. The federal contract value field includes the ceiling of standing offers and supply arrangements — purchasing capacity a department may never draw on. A large figure here can mean a large ceiling rather than a large payment.

Awards are attached to this record only where the evidence identifies exactly one organisation: a name and postal area that narrow to a single company, or a name unique across the whole national corpus. Proactive publication truncates the vendor postal code to three characters, so anything that could belong to more than one company is left unattached rather than guessed at. Totals are a floor in that direction. The full rules.
Qualified to supply the government (1)
CommodityBuying departmentAgreement typeAwardedExpires
——Institution gouvernementale——
This is a different fact from public money above: a standing offer or supply arrangement means the government has pre-agreed to buy specific goods or services from this organisation at set terms if it chooses to — it does not mean any money has changed hands. The source publishes only currently active agreements and carries no dollar figure at all, unlike the contract value field, which sometimes states a ceiling rather than a payment. How this is attached.
Timeline
  1. Federal grant — Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada$6,466
  2. Federal grant — Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada$6,466
  3. Federal grant — Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada$24,246
  4. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  5. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  6. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  7. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  8. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  9. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  10. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$450,000
  11. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$439,200
  12. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  13. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$12,500
  14. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$450,000
  15. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$75,000
  16. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  17. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  18. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  19. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$147,325
  20. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  21. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$12,500
  22. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  23. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  24. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$12,500
  25. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$12,500
  26. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  27. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  28. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
Where this record comes from
DatasetLast capturedCadenceCoverage keptHealth
Proactive disclosure — federal grants and contributions
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 3, 2026P3M1 captures · 0 comparisonscurrent
Montréal food establishments
Ville de Montréal · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
October 25, 2026P1D9 captures · 8 comparisonscurrent
Montréal suppliers
Ville de Montréal · Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
September 5, 2026P1Y1 captures · 0 comparisonscurrent
Freshness is measured, not implied. “Last captured” is when this project last completed a read of the whole source dataset. “Coverage kept” is how many immutable captures and meaningful capture-to-capture comparisons are available. A missed day remains an explicit gap; a later snapshot cannot tell us what happened inside it. See every source.

This page is assembled from open data. It is not an official record, and the registrar is authoritative where the two disagree. How records are assembled.

Represent Cegep Andre-laurendeau? Add a website or contact detail.

More licensed businesss · More in Canada (federal) · Search every record · Compare this organisation · Open the JSON record