entities.ca
Registered charity

Northern Alberta Institute Of Technology

Legal name on the register: NORTHERN ALBERTA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

CA-E-TTVV-W9XFFormerCanada (federal)2 independent sources
$396.4MRevenue reported
$32.1MPublic money on record
22On the board
16Organisations connected
2Independent publishers
70/100Evidence depth
September 8, 2026Latest source capture
On the record
Identifier
CA-E-TTVV-W9XF
Address
11762 106 ST NW, EDMONTON, AB, T5G 2R1
Earliest record
October 17, 2005
Also known as
Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT) · NAIT · Northern Alberta Inst. of Technology
Identifiers held
Charity registration
107781205RR0001
Business number
107781205
Evidence depth
70/100
Layered record

This scores the depth of the public evidence assembled here. It does not score the organisation’s quality, reputation, solvency or risk. The formula is fixed and reproducible. See the formula.

Identityregistrations and identifiers
Operationsmunicipal licences
Filed figuresfinancials or workforce
Public moneycontracts or grants
Relationshipsfiled board or organisation links
Qualificationsstanding offers or supply arrangements
Public activitypermits and recorded work
Regulatorydecided findings
Dated historyevents with effective dates

Additional graph evidence outside the score: 16 organisation connections · 1 same-address neighbours.

Public footprint · version 1

Where this organisation appears in public records

Eight independent dimensions describe the size and shape of the evidence. They are deliberately not added into one company score: a licence, a grant, a director filing and a court finding mean different things.

Footprint is not performance.

A larger bar means more public records of that kind. It does not mean better, worse, safer, larger, more profitable or more reputable.

Identityregistries, identifiers and corroboration
60
Operationslicences and operating places
0
Filed disclosurepublic financials and workforce
60
Public moneycontracts, grants and contribution records
88
Public activitypermits and recorded work
0
Relationshipsfiled board and identifier-linked organisations
81
Regulatorydecided public findings
0
Historydated span and recorded events
92

Each dimension uses fixed, logarithmic caps so one dataset with thousands of repeated rows cannot drown out every other fact. Read the formula and limits.

Registrations
RegistrarInstrumentNumberRegisteredStatus
Canada Revenue AgencyRegistered charity107781205RR0001—Registered
Board and officers on record (22)
NamePositionServing sinceStatus
Kaedee TorrinoNAITSA RepSeptember 1, 2021current
Laura Jo GunterPresident and CEOAugust 24, 2020current
Janet RiopelPublic MemberAugust 15, 2019current
Maya DanielNASA RepOctober 5, 2023ended October 4, 2026
Marina BrunoNAITSA RepSeptember 1, 2023ended August 31, 2025
Solomon LacoursiereNAITSA RepSeptember 1, 2023ended August 31, 2024
Gregory GulashAUPE RepMay 11, 2023ended May 10, 2026
Lorraine RoyerPublic MemberMarch 28, 2023ended March 28, 2026
Don CameronPublic MemberSeptember 27, 2022ended September 26, 2025
Leshan MasikonteNAITSA RepSeptember 1, 2022ended August 31, 2023
Jason PincockPublic MemberAugust 15, 2022ended August 14, 2025
Dan BrownPublic MemberSeptember 29, 2021ended September 28, 2024
Renata MedeirosNAITSA RepSeptember 1, 2021ended August 31, 2023
Jean-Paul PrevostNASA RepJuly 3, 2021ended July 2, 2024
Linda PalladinoPublic MemberMay 29, 2021ended May 28, 2024
Andrew NeigelPublic MemberApril 29, 2020ended March 28, 2026
Kris MauthePublic MemberAugust 15, 2019ended August 17, 2025
Paul VerhesenPublic MemberAugust 15, 2019ended August 17, 2025
Kristina WilliamsPublic MemberAugust 15, 2019ended August 17, 2025
Marlea SleemanPublic MemberAugust 15, 2019ended April 17, 2025
Priti LaderoutePublic MemberMay 30, 2018ended May 28, 2024
Yasmin JivrajPublic MemberMarch 7, 2017ended September 28, 2026

Filed by the charity itself with the Canada Revenue Agency, under the Open Government Licence. This is the narrowest slate the source publishes — name, position, and tenure only; no address, phone, or email exists in the file to withhold. Why this is published and directors’ home addresses never are.

Organisations sharing a filed director name (16)

1 of them shares more than one name, which is a much stronger link than the rest. Those are listed first.

OrganisationKindNames in common
The Northern Alberta Institute Of Technology Foundation
CA-E-B5MC-CA3V
Registered charity5
Careers The Next Generation Foundation
CA-E-QJ4R-679E
Registered charity1
Clark Builders Community Foundation
CA-E-PM8S-C2AH
Registered charity1
Cobequid Society For Athletic Excellence
CA-E-2SD2-M0BN
Registered charity1
Emmanuel Baptist Church (Chatham, Ontario)
CA-E-BNQR-KC9S
Registered charity1
Knox Presbyterian Church
CA-E-1QRQ-XASE
Registered charity1
Little Warriors
CA-E-3YBQ-3F5T
Registered charity1
New Life Christian Church
CA-E-9EW3-1KA1
Registered charity1
Newmarket Church Of The Nazarene
CA-E-2DWH-HQDP
Registered charity1
Riverbend Lutheran Church
CA-E-VCTX-P652
Registered charity1
Sexual Health Options Resources & Education Centre
CA-E-7PSQ-KRDP
Registered charity1
The John Howard Society Of Alberta
CA-E-6NYB-P9RX
Registered charity1
The John Howard Society Of Canada
CA-E-PBFN-HZSG
Registered charity1
The Lisa Brown Charitable Foundation
CA-E-MKJ7-YMNB
Registered charity1
United Way of Saskatoon and Area
CA-E-32WC-Q3XH
Registered charity1
University Hospitals Foundation
CA-E-GRPE-279C
Registered charity1
One name in common is a lead. Two is a link. These come from the director names each organisation filed with the Canada Revenue Agency, matched exactly as filed, and two people can share a name — across the whole corpus 95% of these rest on a single name, so a single match is genuinely weak evidence and is presented as such rather than dressed up. Two of the same names on the same pair of boards is a different matter: coincidence stops being a plausible explanation. A name appearing on more than eight boards is discarded outright as a probable collision.

The link is between organisations and carries only a count. Which people sit on which board stays on each organisation’s own page, exactly as the CRA published it, and there is deliberately no way here to search by a person or to list what one individual is involved in. Why that line is drawn there.
At the same address (1)

Organisations that filed the same street address and suite as this one, 11762 106 ST NW.

OrganisationKind
Go Productivity
CA-E-879A-YPKM
Federal not-for-profit corporation
A shared door is not always a shared purpose. Sharing an address can mean one organisation with several registered arms, a building a sector clusters in, or simply a landlord. It is a fact about where filings were sent, not a claim about who controls whom.

Addresses used here are only ones already published on these pages: where a single publisher asserts an address it is coarsened to a locality, because a registered office is very often somebody’s home. And where 25 or more organisations share one door — a registered agent or a law firm — no connection is drawn at all, because at that point the address describes the agent rather than the organisations. How address precision is decided.
What it raised and spent — year ended March 31, 2024
Total revenue
$396,406,905
Total spending
$357,140,316
Total assets
$848,287,627
Total liabilities
$548,530,183
Receipted donations
$778,483
From other charities
$191,248
Charitable programs90.4% · $322.7M · line 5000
Management and administration9.3% · $33.2M · line 5010
Fundraising0.3% · $1.2M · line 5020
Not broken down in the return0.0% · $1
These are the charity’s own figures. They come from the T3010 return it filed with the Canada Revenue Agency, which is a statement the organisation makes about itself rather than an audit or an assessment of it. They are also a single year: a charity that received a capital gift, sold a building, or ran a campaign will look unlike itself.

A low share spent on programs is not by itself evidence of anything. Fundraising costs money, a year of building a reserve looks like underspending, and grant-making foundations pass money onward rather than running programs. The lines are shown as filed, with the CRA line numbers, so a reader can check them against the return.
Public money on record
Federal contracts
$43,086

across 3 awards, 2005–2010

2005$16K
2007$17K
2010$11K
Paying institutionAwardsValue
National Defence3$43,086
Federal grants and contributions
$32,105,629

across 66 agreements, 2007–2025

2007$5.6M
2013$841K
2014$1.5M
2017$595K
2018$3.4M
2019$3.7M
2020$4.3M
2021$2.4M
2022$3.3M
2023$3.7M
2024$1.6M
2025$1.3M
Value as published, not money paid. The federal contract value field includes the ceiling of standing offers and supply arrangements — purchasing capacity a department may never draw on. A large figure here can mean a large ceiling rather than a large payment.

Awards are attached to this record only where the evidence identifies exactly one organisation: a name and postal area that narrow to a single company, or a name unique across the whole national corpus. Proactive publication truncates the vendor postal code to three characters, so anything that could belong to more than one company is left unattached rather than guessed at. Totals are a floor in that direction. The full rules.
What it does
Industry code
115110 · 541514 · 541990 · 611210 · 611510
North American Industry Classification System
Trade and licence class are the publisher’s own words, kept as written rather than mapped onto a vocabulary of this site’s invention — a Calgary “RESTAURANT” and a Montréal “Restaurant service rapide” describe the same thing and are not the same string, and pretending otherwise would put words in a city’s mouth. The industry code is the exception: NAICS is a standard shared across Canada, the United States and Mexico, so it means the same thing wherever it appears. Only some publishers assign one.
Timeline
  1. Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$267,000
  2. Federal grant — Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada$22,986
  3. Federal grant — Prairies Economic Development Canada$1,000,000
  4. Federal grant — Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada$360,000
  5. Federal grant — Natural Resources Canada$299,374
  6. Federal grant — Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada$21,815
  7. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$886,683
  8. Federal grant — National Research Council Canada$60,000
  9. Federal grant — Natural Resources Canada$247,045
  10. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$2,614,920
  11. Federal grant — Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada$35,935
  12. Federal grant — Natural Resources Canada$300,000
  13. Federal grant — Employment and Social Development Canada$100,000
  14. Federal grant — Prairies Economic Development Canada$308,026
  15. Federal grant — Prairies Economic Development Canada$1,038,538
  16. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$75,000
  17. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$449,884
  18. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$96,745
  19. Federal grant — Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada$44,454
  20. Federal grant — Prairies Economic Development Canada$1,391,700
  21. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$172,000
  22. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  23. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$450,000
  24. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$225,000
  25. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  26. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$360,000
  27. Federal grant — Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada$61,309
  28. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$450,000
  29. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$450,000
  30. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$150,000
  31. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$150,000
  32. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$225,000
  33. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$1,000,000
  34. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$1,867,684
  35. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$948,000
  36. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$25,000
  37. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$150,000
  38. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$15,499
  39. Federal grant — Environment and Climate Change Canada$349,025
  40. Federal grant — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada$75,000

Showing the 40 most recent of 68 dated events.

Where this record comes from
DatasetLast capturedCadenceCoverage keptHealth
Registered charities — directors and officers (2024 returns)
Canada Revenue Agency · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 2, 2026P1Y1 captures · 0 comparisonscurrent
Registered charities — financial data (2024 returns)
Canada Revenue Agency · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 5, 2026P1Y1 captures · 0 comparisonscurrent
Registered charities — identification (2024 returns)
Canada Revenue Agency · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 8, 2026P1Y2 captures · 1 comparisonscurrent
Proactive publication — federal contracts over $10,000
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 1, 2026P3M1 captures · 0 comparisonscurrent
Proactive disclosure — federal grants and contributions
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Open Government Licence – Canada
September 3, 2026P3M1 captures · 0 comparisonscurrent
Freshness is measured, not implied. “Last captured” is when this project last completed a read of the whole source dataset. “Coverage kept” is how many immutable captures and meaningful capture-to-capture comparisons are available. A missed day remains an explicit gap; a later snapshot cannot tell us what happened inside it. See every source.

This page is assembled from open data. It is not an official record, and the registrar is authoritative where the two disagree. How records are assembled.

Represent Northern Alberta Institute Of Technology? Add a website or contact detail.

More registered charitys · More in Canada (federal) · Search every record · Compare this organisation · Open the JSON record